Since Simon Fraser is only one-year long, it means that the time away from work is less, and it costs a lot less as well. So I'm really leaning towards this one, simply from a bottom-line perspective.
Are there reasons why Sauder would be better?
Posted Jan 18, 2013 15:39
Posted Feb 04, 2013 08:26
Posted Feb 04, 2013 11:47
Posted Feb 16, 2013 08:14
Posted Feb 16, 2013 16:56
Posted Mar 13, 2013 18:11
Brandtly - what's your profile? If you have a business background (i.e. undergrad) then SMU may not be for you, since their MBA is geared more towards those without any formal business training.
Are you looking for programs only in Vancouver?Yes
The fees are not the bottom line: the outcome is the bottom line. Students from UBC graduate onto $78K and SFU grads get $60K.
Posted Feb 17, 2014 16:31
Posted Feb 17, 2014 17:38
Posted Feb 18, 2014 16:29
When comparing it with Uvic, the salaries are lower, the tuition and cost of living are higher, and the curriculum and accreditation seem nearly identical. Yet, SFU it's continuously in Canada's top ten and Uvic is never mentioned.
Posted Feb 18, 2014 16:36
Posted Feb 19, 2014 17:33
They have a lot of international students, so maybe they are finding high paying jobs in other countries?
Article Mar 12, 2018
An in-depth look at the rankings of Canadian MBA programs and some background on the ranked business schools in the country