Hi Katalina,
Carlos III is one of the most prestigious centers of higher education in Spain, and is very well known throughout Europe. It has been very innovative in several respects: it was one of the first Spanish universities (public or private) to deliver graduate and undergraduate programs in English, to hire its faculty internationally, and to establish a "US-style" tenure-track system based on research outcomes (faculty are hired upon completion of PhD program and have to publish in good journals or otherwise are fired). The schools that you mention did have programs in English, but did not have "US-style" tenure track systems: they would hire professors and then keep them even if they didn't have good research records. In that sense Carlos III has been ahead of the business schools. It also has very nice facilities and beautiful campuses which do not conform with the stereotype.
I don't know what you mean by "real" business or by sophistication. Carlos III follows the US business school model, which emphasizes research. Faculty at Wharton or Kellogg is not composed of practitioners: faculty members are 90% academics who have to prove themselves mostly by doing research, and also by effectively teaching. But research is most important. ESADE and EADA follow a different system, where research is not that important. Their publication records are very poor. IE used to be like that but has tried to change, and IESE is somewhere in between.
UT Dallas has a ranking of schools based on business research. You can google it. It's a nice ranking because it focuses on the quality rather than the quantity of research. You'll notice two things. First, all Spanish institutions are pretty mediocre in research, and that includes IESE, IE, ESADE, etc. They don't even make it to the top 100, and are far from there. Second, within Spain, IESE comes first, then comes Carlos III, then IE,and finally ESADE and EADA.
As far as employability is concerned, Carlos III is very well known to Spanish employers and has a very good reputation within Spain. Although the MBA is very small, it has a large undergraduate degree in business which is considered among the best in Spain.
I don't think Carlos is well known to foreign employers, but neither is EADA. In fact, I would say that Carlos is better known than EADA. But my point is that it's not really a matter of "publics" versus "privates". You have to look at it program by program. In Spain there are good and bad public universities, and also good and bad private schools. You can't oversimplify.
I also think networking opportunities are weak at Carlos III, but I don't think this has to do with its public nature. I think it has to do with the fact that the program is quite young, so there's not many alumni "out there". IESE, IE and ESADE have a clear lead there.
I also have a question for you. I don't really understand why you are so interested in a Spanish MBA. If you want something really global I think you should definitely go to the US. I think this is where the most serious schools are. Is it because you are looking for a one-year degree, or is it a financial matter perhaps?
Carlos III is one of the most prestigious centers of higher education in Spain, and is very well known throughout Europe. It has been very innovative in several respects: it was one of the first Spanish universities (public or private) to deliver graduate and undergraduate programs in English, to hire its faculty internationally, and to establish a "US-style" tenure-track system based on research outcomes (faculty are hired upon completion of PhD program and have to publish in good journals or otherwise are fired). The schools that you mention did have programs in English, but did not have "US-style" tenure track systems: they would hire professors and then keep them even if they didn't have good research records. In that sense Carlos III has been ahead of the business schools. It also has very nice facilities and beautiful campuses which do not conform with the stereotype.
I don't know what you mean by "real" business or by sophistication. Carlos III follows the US business school model, which emphasizes research. Faculty at Wharton or Kellogg is not composed of practitioners: faculty members are 90% academics who have to prove themselves mostly by doing research, and also by effectively teaching. But research is most important. ESADE and EADA follow a different system, where research is not that important. Their publication records are very poor. IE used to be like that but has tried to change, and IESE is somewhere in between.
UT Dallas has a ranking of schools based on business research. You can google it. It's a nice ranking because it focuses on the quality rather than the quantity of research. You'll notice two things. First, all Spanish institutions are pretty mediocre in research, and that includes IESE, IE, ESADE, etc. They don't even make it to the top 100, and are far from there. Second, within Spain, IESE comes first, then comes Carlos III, then IE,and finally ESADE and EADA.
As far as employability is concerned, Carlos III is very well known to Spanish employers and has a very good reputation within Spain. Although the MBA is very small, it has a large undergraduate degree in business which is considered among the best in Spain.
I don't think Carlos is well known to foreign employers, but neither is EADA. In fact, I would say that Carlos is better known than EADA. But my point is that it's not really a matter of "publics" versus "privates". You have to look at it program by program. In Spain there are good and bad public universities, and also good and bad private schools. You can't oversimplify.
I also think networking opportunities are weak at Carlos III, but I don't think this has to do with its public nature. I think it has to do with the fact that the program is quite young, so there's not many alumni "out there". IESE, IE and ESADE have a clear lead there.
I also have a question for you. I don't really understand why you are so interested in a Spanish MBA. If you want something really global I think you should definitely go to the US. I think this is where the most serious schools are. Is it because you are looking for a one-year degree, or is it a financial matter perhaps?