I've been admitted to IE's International MBA program and I'm very confident make it to all of these programs for the Full-Time MBA, September 24 intake.
I was delighted to get into IE but then I started communicating with the alums and they all said the same thing:
1) Terrible Career Support team
2) The European Market is bleak
3) IE's admission to the IMBA program is not very selective and honestly, they'd admit anyone, although I don't think that's completely true.
I'm from a consulting background and work for my family-owned management advisory firm in India. My immediate post-MBA goal would be to work in consulting (outside India) and settle aborad. Long-term: Entrepreneurship. Heard good things about Imperial and Warwick. Katz, well, it's a different market altogether but not that well ranked in the US. The location is not a big factor to me and I'm comfortable anywhere. (Even if I end up going to IE, I'll make all the efforts to be fluent in Spanish).
Which one would you choose and why?
I was delighted to get into IE but then I started communicating with the alums and they all said the same thing:
1) Terrible Career Support team
2) The European Market is bleak
3) IE's admission to the IMBA program is not very selective and honestly, they'd admit anyone, although I don't think that's completely true.
I'm from a consulting background and work for my family-owned management advisory firm in India. My immediate post-MBA goal would be to work in consulting (outside India) and settle aborad. Long-term: Entrepreneurship. Heard good things about Imperial and Warwick. Katz, well, it's a different market altogether but not that well ranked in the US. The location is not a big factor to me and I'm comfortable anywhere. (Even if I end up going to IE, I'll make all the efforts to be fluent in Spanish).
Which one would you choose and why?