I wanted to reach out, and hear everyone's thoughts about which program is better either Henley EMBA or Cambridge Judge EMBA. I am a Director of IT for a biotech/ pharma company with 20 yrs of management experience.
Cambridge Judge Business School and Henley Busines School
Posted Dec 28, 2016 16:33
I wanted to reach out, and hear everyone's thoughts about which program is better either Henley EMBA or Cambridge Judge EMBA. I am a Director of IT for a biotech/ pharma company with 20 yrs of management experience.
Posted Dec 28, 2016 21:50
Unless you are focused on a country where Henley has deeper roots (Finland,maybe?) Cambridge is so obviously the better choice that I am surprised you even ask.
Unless you are focused on a country where Henley has deeper roots (Finland,maybe?) Cambridge is so obviously the better choice that I am surprised you even ask.
Posted Dec 29, 2016 02:39
Duncan,
Thank you for taking the time to reply. I appreciate your candidness and your succinct answer but can you expand on it? I realize the ranking the Judge has in comparison to Henley, but it seems as though Henley is moving up the list over the last few years. The cost of each EMBA is interesting as well. Henley's EMBA only costs less than $30k USD. It has been able to keep its accreditation, unlike Hult. Most rankings show Judge only being lower than Oxford and LBS but it also costs $80k USD.
I would really like to know your expanded thoughts on Judge? I would also be curious as to where your insight is coming from e.g. recruitment, etc., or is it just from reading the rankings from FT or Economist? I ask because I am genuinely interested in knowing how those schools are viewed in the non-academic world.
Here is the latest FT ranking:
http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/executive-mba-ranking-2016
Thanks,
Jay
Thank you for taking the time to reply. I appreciate your candidness and your succinct answer but can you expand on it? I realize the ranking the Judge has in comparison to Henley, but it seems as though Henley is moving up the list over the last few years. The cost of each EMBA is interesting as well. Henley's EMBA only costs less than $30k USD. It has been able to keep its accreditation, unlike Hult. Most rankings show Judge only being lower than Oxford and LBS but it also costs $80k USD.
I would really like to know your expanded thoughts on Judge? I would also be curious as to where your insight is coming from e.g. recruitment, etc., or is it just from reading the rankings from FT or Economist? I ask because I am genuinely interested in knowing how those schools are viewed in the non-academic world.
Here is the latest FT ranking:
http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/executive-mba-ranking-2016
Thanks,
Jay
[Edited by jsiglasky on Dec 29, 2016]
Duncan,
Thank you for taking the time to reply. I appreciate your candidness and your succinct answer but can you expand on it? I realize the ranking the Judge has in comparison to Henley, but it seems as though Henley is moving up the list over the last few years. The cost of each EMBA is interesting as well. Henley's EMBA only costs less than $30k USD. It has been able to keep its accreditation, unlike Hult. Most rankings show Judge only being lower than Oxford and LBS but it also costs $80k USD.
I would really like to know your expanded thoughts on Judge? I would also be curious as to where your insight is coming from e.g. recruitment, etc., or is it just from reading the rankings from FT or Economist? I ask because I am genuinely interested in knowing how those schools are viewed in the non-academic world.
Here is the latest FT ranking:
http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/executive-mba-ranking-2016
Thanks,
Jay
Thank you for taking the time to reply. I appreciate your candidness and your succinct answer but can you expand on it? I realize the ranking the Judge has in comparison to Henley, but it seems as though Henley is moving up the list over the last few years. The cost of each EMBA is interesting as well. Henley's EMBA only costs less than $30k USD. It has been able to keep its accreditation, unlike Hult. Most rankings show Judge only being lower than Oxford and LBS but it also costs $80k USD.
I would really like to know your expanded thoughts on Judge? I would also be curious as to where your insight is coming from e.g. recruitment, etc., or is it just from reading the rankings from FT or Economist? I ask because I am genuinely interested in knowing how those schools are viewed in the non-academic world.
Here is the latest FT ranking:
http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/executive-mba-ranking-2016
Thanks,
Jay
Posted Dec 29, 2016 14:28
Read my profile. My opinion is based on deep experience. The difference in fees is unimportant. What matters is the fit with your goals.
Read my profile. My opinion is based on deep experience. The difference in fees is unimportant. What matters is the fit with your goals.
Posted Jan 02, 2017 15:35
It has been able to keep its accreditation, unlike Hult.
For clarity's sake, it's worth noting that Hult is accredited by AMBA. My guess is that they'll probably have triple accreditation once AACSB and EQUIS complete their post-Ashridge merger evaluation. As far as I know they've never *lost* accreditation status.
That's not to say their MBAs are comparable to the other schools. Just a note for clarification.
[quote]It has been able to keep its accreditation, unlike Hult. [/quote]
For clarity's sake, it's worth noting that Hult is accredited by AMBA. My guess is that they'll probably have triple accreditation once AACSB and EQUIS complete their post-Ashridge merger evaluation. As far as I know they've never *lost* accreditation status.
That's not to say their MBAs are comparable to the other schools. Just a note for clarification.
For clarity's sake, it's worth noting that Hult is accredited by AMBA. My guess is that they'll probably have triple accreditation once AACSB and EQUIS complete their post-Ashridge merger evaluation. As far as I know they've never *lost* accreditation status.
That's not to say their MBAs are comparable to the other schools. Just a note for clarification.
Posted Jan 02, 2017 15:59
Razor,
You are correct. I was making a comment based on the rankings in FT reported by Poet and Quants article: http://poetsandquants.com/2016/02/20/hult-international-out-of-ft-ranking-again/
According to Hult's web page they are accredited by the following bodies:
http://www.hult.edu/en/about-us/rankings-and-accreditation/
Thank you for bringing up that point for clarity.
You are correct. I was making a comment based on the rankings in FT reported by Poet and Quants article: http://poetsandquants.com/2016/02/20/hult-international-out-of-ft-ranking-again/
According to Hult's web page they are accredited by the following bodies:
http://www.hult.edu/en/about-us/rankings-and-accreditation/
Thank you for bringing up that point for clarity.
Razor,
You are correct. I was making a comment based on the rankings in FT reported by Poet and Quants article: http://poetsandquants.com/2016/02/20/hult-international-out-of-ft-ranking-again/
According to Hult's web page they are accredited by the following bodies:
http://www.hult.edu/en/about-us/rankings-and-accreditation/
Thank you for bringing up that point for clarity.
You are correct. I was making a comment based on the rankings in FT reported by Poet and Quants article: http://poetsandquants.com/2016/02/20/hult-international-out-of-ft-ranking-again/
According to Hult's web page they are accredited by the following bodies:
http://www.hult.edu/en/about-us/rankings-and-accreditation/
Thank you for bringing up that point for clarity.
Related Business Schools
Cambridge, United Kingdom
53 Followers
293 Discussions
Reading, United Kingdom
21 Followers
208 Discussions
Other Related Content
Beyond London: MBA Programs in England
Article Jun 08, 2012
How MBA programs outside the capital can offer global, practical experience