all rankings are bullshit... especially the FT

Andy is mistaken. Anyone who followed the same methodology as the FT or QS in the same way would get to the same results. The FT has more transparent and objective attributes and the data are independently audited. QS is able to cover many more schools<br><br>I think the two FT ranking and the QS rankings are useful tools. They take different approaches to schools where the volume of available data is low. The FT excludes those schools; QS includes them. Both approaches have strengths and weaknesses.&nbsp;<br><br>FT preexperience: https://rankings.ft.com/rankings/2874/masters-in-finance-pre-experience-2022<br><br>FT Post-experience: https://rankings.ft.com/rankings/2870/masters-in-finance-post-experience-2022<br><br>QS: https://www.qschina.cn/en/university-rankings/business-masters-rankings/finance/2022

I am not sure why you are cutting and pasting like this, but LPU is not a well-ranked MiF and lacks any of the three "crown" accreditations.&nbsp;