Hi Raphael
I understand your viewpoint, believe me. I'm not British, so I don't use the Queen's English. I'm not a very formal person, either. I'm an American from Los Angeles, so I do suffer from the occasional joking at the hands of my UK friends. But please understand my original note. I too, came to find-mba.com to get assistance and varied viewpoints and ideas regarding business schools. I found it a great help and would love to return the favor now and in the future. Only problem is, I have stumbled upon a few threads that have left me very confused. I can't entirely understand the meaning and have no way of contributing. I don't really care about proper grammar in informal settings. But there is a difference between casual writing and just plain bad English. I can honestly tell that some of the people writing on this site are sure to have a few troubles during classroom discussions and with coursework, based on what I've seen
I said nothing about Indians. Many of the Indians I've met in my programme write perfect English. Even Americans are guilty of their own common mistakes. I myself am just getting used to writing words like licence, privatise and programme.
Now I didn't initially bring this up, but as for some of the questions go, I've found myself answering the same questions over and over again. I did ask for others to compare certain elements of Cass and Aston during my application process. But now I'm starting to read questions like, "should I join this programme, or that programme?" That is just plain wrong. You should ask whether your short-listed programmes have certain resources you require, not whether you should attend. Every business school in the world, triple-accredited or not, is perfect for someone. It is up to that someone to make the determination.
Sorry for the speech. Just felt compelled to clarify.
Cheers (getting used to saying that as well)