Hello!
I applied a little later than most people so I missed out on opportunities to apply to most ranked schools this year. In addition to these 3 schools, I've applied to Warwick and Imperial without a GMAT for now. I took one last month but scored really low so I plan to take it again on 15th June. It would be my second attempt. Warwick and Imperial emailed me and said that I need to get 700+ in my GMAT to be a competitive applicant. I'm not sure if I can score that much in June. They both evaluated my profile based on my CV and said that I will get past the first round.
I have worked for ~5 years in the human rights sector in different roles in India. I've led a team for a prominent policymaker in India. I've worked with international NGOs. I worked for a think tank in Washington D.C. for a summer. In my current role, I lead a non-profit I founded in 2018. I decided to get an MBA degree in hoping that it would help me make a smooth transition into a new role, new industry and in a new country.
I would like to move into the Tech industry in a Strategic Partnership or Business Development role. A Business Strategy Consultant also fits the role I see myself in.
Scholarship is an important factor in my decision but if I'm convinced that a particular school is significantly better, even in the absence of financial support from the school, then I'd be happy to take a chance with my finances.
I would appreciate your thoughts on the following schools for the September 21 intake:
1. Lancaster: I like the 3 consulting challenges in the curriculum. It would a good addition to my resume and show employers that I have demonstrable foundational knowledge to transition into the private sector or generally, into the business world. They gave me about 50% tuition scholarship and that definitely earns them extra points. But they are falling out of rankings like FT (or have they completely fallen and I'm not aware of it?) and I'm concerned if that would somehow affect my job search given that I'll be making a triple jump. I saw the weighted salary of their alums fell by $10k in 2018 which could be alarming. But then again, I don't think I've done enough research to thoroughly understand the biases with FT's statistical calculations. What does everyone think?
2. Strathclyde: They seem to have a pretty general curriculum. Nothing really stands out to me in terms of curriculum or course structure. I do like that it is in Glasgow. No scholarship from this school. FT rankings are okay.
3. Cranfield: Other MBA aspirants I've talked to seem to prefer Cranfield over the other two on grounds that they have better curriculum. I don't see how their curriculum is better on the sole reason that they have 1 independent project/ consulting project at the end of the course and that seems to be as experiential as it gets. No scholarship from the school. They seem to do better in the rankings than the other 2 schools.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on the schools given the factors I have to take into account in my decision.
I applied a little later than most people so I missed out on opportunities to apply to most ranked schools this year. In addition to these 3 schools, I've applied to Warwick and Imperial without a GMAT for now. I took one last month but scored really low so I plan to take it again on 15th June. It would be my second attempt. Warwick and Imperial emailed me and said that I need to get 700+ in my GMAT to be a competitive applicant. I'm not sure if I can score that much in June. They both evaluated my profile based on my CV and said that I will get past the first round.
I have worked for ~5 years in the human rights sector in different roles in India. I've led a team for a prominent policymaker in India. I've worked with international NGOs. I worked for a think tank in Washington D.C. for a summer. In my current role, I lead a non-profit I founded in 2018. I decided to get an MBA degree in hoping that it would help me make a smooth transition into a new role, new industry and in a new country.
I would like to move into the Tech industry in a Strategic Partnership or Business Development role. A Business Strategy Consultant also fits the role I see myself in.
Scholarship is an important factor in my decision but if I'm convinced that a particular school is significantly better, even in the absence of financial support from the school, then I'd be happy to take a chance with my finances.
I would appreciate your thoughts on the following schools for the September 21 intake:
1. Lancaster: I like the 3 consulting challenges in the curriculum. It would a good addition to my resume and show employers that I have demonstrable foundational knowledge to transition into the private sector or generally, into the business world. They gave me about 50% tuition scholarship and that definitely earns them extra points. But they are falling out of rankings like FT (or have they completely fallen and I'm not aware of it?) and I'm concerned if that would somehow affect my job search given that I'll be making a triple jump. I saw the weighted salary of their alums fell by $10k in 2018 which could be alarming. But then again, I don't think I've done enough research to thoroughly understand the biases with FT's statistical calculations. What does everyone think?
2. Strathclyde: They seem to have a pretty general curriculum. Nothing really stands out to me in terms of curriculum or course structure. I do like that it is in Glasgow. No scholarship from this school. FT rankings are okay.
3. Cranfield: Other MBA aspirants I've talked to seem to prefer Cranfield over the other two on grounds that they have better curriculum. I don't see how their curriculum is better on the sole reason that they have 1 independent project/ consulting project at the end of the course and that seems to be as experiential as it gets. No scholarship from the school. They seem to do better in the rankings than the other 2 schools.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on the schools given the factors I have to take into account in my decision.
-(1)-94485.jpeg)
