Dear All,
Am offered a place in Strathclyde and Birmingham BS for fall 2011. I have been doing an extensive research for last one year or so and am having a fair idea regarding UK universities. But after FT 2011 rankings placing Birmingham in 68 and Strathclyde in 77, am confused! I know Strathclyde steals the show from a triple accredition, course content and strategic standpoint but Birmingham has the location advantage for better job prospects. Need you advise on which one to go for considering both post job prospects in UK (still recovering from the downturn) and resume weightage post MBA. Does location advantage really matter for jobs in UK and what would be a better ROI(Return Of Investment) in the long run?
Profile - MCA/7 yrs exp in IT/Junior Mgmt/Good Intl exposure
Thanks in advance!
Am offered a place in Strathclyde and Birmingham BS for fall 2011. I have been doing an extensive research for last one year or so and am having a fair idea regarding UK universities. But after FT 2011 rankings placing Birmingham in 68 and Strathclyde in 77, am confused! I know Strathclyde steals the show from a triple accredition, course content and strategic standpoint but Birmingham has the location advantage for better job prospects. Need you advise on which one to go for considering both post job prospects in UK (still recovering from the downturn) and resume weightage post MBA. Does location advantage really matter for jobs in UK and what would be a better ROI(Return Of Investment) in the long run?
Profile - MCA/7 yrs exp in IT/Junior Mgmt/Good Intl exposure
Thanks in advance!