The fundamental problem is that MG89 is approaching their education choice backwards - starting with schools rather than career goals. They have valuable experience in aviation operations and multiple languages, but haven't defined what specific role or country they want to target.
Without clear career objectives, they're getting caught up in less relevant factors like state recognition and ECTS credits, while potentially missing more important considerations for their situation like:
-- Access to relevant industry connections and recruitment pipelines
-- Geographic alignment with target job markets
-- Program content matched to skill gaps they need to fill
-- Teaching methods suited to their learning needs as a working professional
The schools they're considering (EADA, Exeter, Cranfield, ESSCA) are all respectable institutions, but rankings and accreditations matter far less than whether a specific program will help them transition into their target role in their desired location.
For someone wanting to move from aviation operations into business analysis or consulting, I would recommend:
--> Deciding on a target country first, since the European job market operates largely along national lines outside top consulting firms
--> Researching which firms in that market hire career switchers into analyst/consulting roles
--> Looking at where those companies recruit from and what skills/qualifications they value
Only then evaluating programs based on how well they address those specific needs
The fact that they need to study online while working adds another filter - they should look specifically at how online programs connect students to employers and support career transitions.
Rather than comparing school reputations in abstract, I would encourage MG89 to talk to people who have made similar career transitions in their target market and learn what pathways worked for them. This would likely provide much more valuable insight for their decision than general rankings or accreditations.
The fundamental problem is that MG89 is approaching their education choice backwards - starting with schools rather than career goals. They have valuable experience in aviation operations and multiple languages, but haven't defined what specific role or country they want to target.
Without clear career objectives, they're getting caught up in less relevant factors like state recognition and ECTS credits, while potentially missing more important considerations for their situation like:
-- Access to relevant industry connections and recruitment pipelines
-- Geographic alignment with target job markets
-- Program content matched to skill gaps they need to fill
-- Teaching methods suited to their learning needs as a working professional
The schools they're considering (EADA, Exeter, Cranfield, ESSCA) are all respectable institutions, but rankings and accreditations matter far less than whether a specific program will help them transition into their target role in their desired location.
For someone wanting to move from aviation operations into business analysis or consulting, I would recommend:
--> Deciding on a target country first, since the European job market operates largely along national lines outside top consulting firms
--> Researching which firms in that market hire career switchers into analyst/consulting roles
--> Looking at where those companies recruit from and what skills/qualifications they value
Only then evaluating programs based on how well they address those specific needs
The fact that they need to study online while working adds another filter - they should look specifically at how online programs connect students to employers and support career transitions.
Rather than comparing school reputations in abstract, I would encourage MG89 to talk to people who have made similar career transitions in their target market and learn what pathways worked for them. This would likely provide much more valuable insight for their decision than general rankings or accreditations.
