Hello everyone.

I am about to graduate in Political Science from UCM having spent 2 out of the 4 years of the program abroad; firstly at Warwick uni and secondly (now) at UPF.

I decided not long ago that i wanted to complement my education with a Msc in business and since I wanted to remain at Barcelona I applied to three schools: EAE, EADA and UPF's barcelona school of management.

The program is a similar one. Msc of Science in International Business at UPF and International Msc in Management at EADA. (EAE was soon discarded as I grew suspicious of their aggresive marketing methods and dubious rankings)

Now I have -thankfully- made it thru the last stages: i got the spot at UPF and tomorrow i will be doing the interview at EADA.

Given things go well and I have a choice...where do I go??? Im struggling to find someone from the business industry who can give a clear and direct answer. That's how I found this awesome site (where I got some tips for EADA's interview btw, thanks guys!)

UPF is really good in business as we all now...but EADA is ranked in a prestigious ranking like the FT (top 20 in the world for my program) while UPF's doesnt even appear- being in its infancy the cause that is taking a toll on their recognition internationally at the rankings, i guess

For instance, the Msc at UPF is only 3 years old..!

I know for sure that if i go to UPF i will reach my objective: to get a solid business education in english and eventually get a job in the wide business industry (or god knows where, but at least to be more employable)

But my question is...if I choose EADA...will the difference be that big?

Thanks in advance...