Which one is the best in terms of placement and learning....
lancaster v/s cranfield v/s robert gordon
Posted Sep 05, 2013 17:50
0
Which one is the best in terms of placement and learning....
Posted Sep 06, 2013 01:45
0
Doesn't the FT ranking answer that question?
Doesn't the FT ranking answer that question?
Posted Sep 06, 2013 04:39
0
No, it doesn't. As some universities are having very course content and acrredited by required bodies but these uni are no where in FT list.
No, it doesn't. As some universities are having very course content and acrredited by required bodies but these uni are no where in FT list.
Posted Sep 06, 2013 11:02
0
Lancaster and Cranfield are in the FT ranking because they have better placement; Robert Gordon is not, because it does not. http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/global-mba-ranking-2013 All three are accredited by AMBA, so they will have similar core courses.
Lancaster and Cranfield are in the FT ranking because they have better placement; Robert Gordon is not, because it does not. http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/global-mba-ranking-2013 All three are accredited by AMBA, so they will have similar core courses.
Related Business Schools
Bedford, United Kingdom
44 Followers
414 Discussions
Lancaster, United Kingdom
26 Followers
335 Discussions
-(1)-94485.jpeg)
Other Related Content
MBA Rankings: Finding the Best Business Schools
Article Jul 24, 2012
From the FT to Businessweek, we discuss the importance of rankings and how they work
