Why not go to a university with an accredited MBA instead? Go to http://www.find-mba.com/uk-ireland/1 and click on "Show AACSB-, AMBA- and EQUIS-accredited programs only ". The return on investment is much better for MBAs that are respected by employers.

<blockquote>Why not go to a university with an accredited MBA instead? Go to http://www.find-mba.com/uk-ireland/1 and click on "Show AACSB-, AMBA- and EQUIS-accredited programs only ". The return on investment is much better for MBAs that are respected by employers.</blockquote>

thanks for your reply. i dont have any work experience so how will i get an admission into AMBA accredited universities. ?

For a better RoI than Coventry, either:
-get more work experience now and then get into an accredited programmes later or
-take a pre-experience MSc in management at an accredited school, ideally one of those ranked by the FT.

<blockquote>For a better RoI than Coventry, either:
-get more work experience now and then get into an accredited programmes later or
-take a pre-experience MSc in management at an accredited school, ideally one of those ranked by the FT. </blockquote>

What if i want to go now. Which university will be the best choice to go for MBA without any experience.

These ones will have the best RoI: http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/masters-in-management

i mean about MBA, not masters.

Don't take an MBA without experience. They will not have a good RoI. You will earn more if you get an MSc from a top school.

yes buddy you are right. i understand what you are trying to say. I will think about it. Could you please help me out with this question which is the good university to do mba without work experience in jan 2012.

No, there is no good MBA where the students do not have work experience.

what about from the universities which offer for freshers like ljmu, coventry, staffordshine, london south bank, greenwich. i wanted to go cardiff but the intake is in September.

No, these MBAs will offer you a much worse RoI than a pre-experience MSc. Average salaries for their MBA graduates will be under $40,000, versus around $50,000 for the graduates of the FT-ranked MSc programmes (http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/masters-in-management). Why pay more for a worse outcome and a much lower-quality university? It would not be a good choice.

Generally speaking, no accredited on-campus MBA outside the USA will accept candidates without work experience. That's also true in the USA, unless you have exceptional academic scores and extra-curricular experience.

An exception will be online MBAs. Many of these schools (http://www.find-mba.com/board/21614) are AASCB accredited and do not require work experience. However, the MSc will generally have much better careers support and placement records than online degrees.

I agree. If you are planning to stay back in UK then MSc from FT ranked B-School would be a better option, however in some countries like India (MBA enjoys better reputation then MSc degrees.) so it depends what are your priorities.

<blockquote>I want to do my MBA in uk, i have part time job. i have some universities in mind. i have decided to go to coventry. I just cant decide whether the main campus or the london campus is better? as in job, campus., value
Hope to get a reply soon.</blockquote>

I think these are equally weak options. You will be better attending a business school with international accreditation.

So Coventry MBA does not have any accreditation ?

And what if i already have a MSc and i want to add some value to my CV with an MBA ,
will i still be payed under 40,000 ?

It does not have any respected international accreditation. No, I guess that 40k is well over the average for Coventry MBAs. For those salaries you should take an MSc at a good business school.