Henley does have better reputation, especially in Britain. It and Ashridge are the oldest management development centres, and Henley's position inside a large university gives is added credibility. Its part-time and full-time EMBA has been a very high status programme, and the school has a strong infrastructure for the new full-time MBA, which follows the same curriculum. So everything looks set for it to be a programme quite on a par with Aston or Birmingham and better than regional competitors like Brookes, Brunel, Royal Holloway.
That said, the great reputation has to be balanced up against the teething troubles that every new MBA has. I think that is the reason why the Henley FT MBA trades at such a discount for its first year. But, frankly, the placement situation is so bad in Britain that perhaps the difference doesn't matter.
Henley does have better reputation, especially in Britain. It and Ashridge are the oldest management development centres, and Henley's position inside a large university gives is added credibility. Its part-time and full-time EMBA has been a very high status programme, and the school has a strong infrastructure for the new full-time MBA, which follows the same curriculum. So everything looks set for it to be a programme quite on a par with Aston or Birmingham and better than regional competitors like Brookes, Brunel, Royal Holloway.
That said, the great reputation has to be balanced up against the teething troubles that every new MBA has. I think that is the reason why the Henley FT MBA trades at such a discount for its first year. But, frankly, the placement situation is so bad in Britain that perhaps the difference doesn't matter.