Hi,
I've read all posts here relating to Henley, and Aston and I'm still pretty much in the limbo about which one to choose. I hope that maybe Duncan, Ezra and Mamit could chime in and help me decide. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you, gents.
It's a choice between Aston MBA (12 months), and Henley EMBA (21 months). I also got accepted for Nottingham University Business School EMBA but it is more of a backup.
A little background info about me:
I'm fairly young, 33 with about 5 years of solid managerial experience (enough to meet the EMBA requirements), but at smaller companies and nothing spectacular such as GM at GE or VP of Shell or even a Generic Manager at Morgan Stanley :)
Therefore I am not looking to advance within my current company, I much rather look for more rewarding and promising job opportunities after graduation. My main objective would be to get into BBC or National Geographic to work as a generic manager or maybe even producer of some kind, since I also have a degree in Television. I'm hoping that MBA/EMBA will open the doors for me a little more. Second reason is that I have an option to start my own business. At this point it's hard to say which option will pan out, so I want to keep them both on the table. Either way MBA should help.
So my questions/concerns are as follows:
1) Is there really any significant difference between MBA and EMBA? I've read on many websites that there isn't, that EMBA is just part-time MBA. But when I compare program descriptions on Henley website there are a slight differences, even though they appear mainly cosmetic (for marketing reasons?) It appears that EMBA, not only applies theory but you also need to apply them to your company? Is that the big difference that practically doubles the tuition costs or is there more?
Also coming from a small company will I be even able to apply many of these concepts to my work? There is almost no one to manage right now and I'm afraid if it won't be a loss on my end.
2) Are recruiters more excited to see EMBA or MBA on a CV, or would they rather be more excited to see Henley over Aston? Or what seems to be the dominant advantage in this case?
3) Which program/school would be more recognized internationally? Both are triple accredited, so no difference there, but will Henley have a better global brand than Aston... Is it swift and rising David (Aston) vs the falling Goliath (Henley)? or will in this case Nottingham win altogether?
4) Why is Henley ranking so inconsistent from year to year on which MBA and FT websites? It?s either in the top 50, or nowhere to be found at all. Maybe Aston being 80th, but pretty consistent is a more reliable choice?
5) Why is Henley post-graduate salary almost double that of Aston graduate? Is it real? In which case spending more on tuition would be justified or is it only because many existing execs go for Henley EMBA to get promotion within their companies and therefore their salaries are much bigger to begin with?
6) Who has a better placemen network and post-grad connections? It would seem obvious that Henley with their 35,000 grads, over Aston's 3000, but FT ranks Henley?s career services rather poorly (that is when even Henley appears in rankings) while Aston seems to be doing quite good for their students.
7) Finally, does any of these schools have better connection with media industry such as film or television?
Very sorry for this looong post, but maybe it will help the others make up their minds between the two schools - the rising Aston and falling(?) Henley. Thanks again.