You asked for CEO's in the top 500 and I have given you this easily, you asked for people in the parliament and I have given you many and there are still more.
If you are not aware of those people, then it is lack of knowledge so you can't judge a school to have gaps if you are not aware of its achievements. Robert Fisk is one of the most well known correspondents worldwide and he is a Lancaster graduate.
Neither cranfield nor warwick have achieved a noble prize. Yet, they are both good schools. So achieving a noble prize of course adds to the prestige of the school, but it is not necessary a reason to add more value.
Lancaster is known for its research especially in physics and management and if you look closely by breaking the silos, you will find out that the university has made some discoveries "The development of water saving techniques for agriculture which have helped farmers in some of the driest regions of the world "
Also "Lancaster scientists were in Switzerland participating and observing the successful switch on of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) - the world?s biggest science experiment and they were invited to be part of the experiments as they are leaders worldwide in this field.
Each university has its gaps and I know a friend at warwick who was on a marketing strategy course and students were lousy and inexperienced and the course was basic and the support was minimal? is this what you call quality? Check student satisfaction rates issued this year and you can see that Lancaster is in the top 10.
Dear friend, what matters is your experience and what you take from it. You might be from Harvard, but yet lack the personality or the talent in many other aspects of life. An argument can go on and on, but this wont change anything because you are stringent on one point that Lancaster has its gaps and other schools are perfect. Sorry to say, that you are inaccurate with what you are saying and in each thread you share you hip hop from one point to another. You started with how famous are teachers, then to how famous are alumni then now you are counting noble prizes. Not all universities got noble prizes and this does not make them any less from other schools. Warwick is a 40 years old institution, yet it is an excellent one, so age does not matter much. Same for lancatser, it is a young institution but it has some of the best professors in the world and can compete with all schools in research power and quality. 92% of Lancaster research is judged as world leading, please check this on RAE2008. Honestly I donno your background and where you come from, but you are mixing topics and your argument is rather weak. If you want to discuss this further, you can add me on skype or msn and i will be more than happy to discuss this further :)