Warwick' MSc Marketing & Strategy Vs. Lancaster' MSc Advanced Marketing Managmen

mido

2 3

Posted Jul 19, 2012 15:06

Hi there!

I have received offers from the following universities for 2012 intake:

- Lancaster University Management School: MSc Advanced Marketing Management
- Warwick Business School: MSc Marketing & Strategy

I am pretty confused between the two and have to take my decision very very soon....
Could someone advise please on how do the two compare to each other in terms of:
- Ranking and overall reputation of the business school?
-Ranking of the particular programme I've applied for?
- Employability after graduating?
- Value for money?

Your help will be greatly appreciated.

quote

Duncan

14.013 15.475

Posted Jul 19, 2012 19:44

If you want to work in marketing, go to Lancaster. If not, go to Warwick. Use the FT Masters in Management ranking for a general comparison. Both are strong schools.

quote

mido

2 3

Posted Jul 19, 2012 20:15

Thank you so much Duncan for the answer provided.
If I look into the ft ranking, I would have to go with Warwick. But when it comes to the course content, then the Lancaster' one have a big plus, especially with the collaboration of Microsoft on that programme.
What's the overall reputation of Lancaster management school in the UK? and globally?
And what about its marketing department

Thanks in advance.

quote

Duncan

14.013 15.475

Posted Jul 19, 2012 21:51

It's an excellent school. It has IMPM - a joint masters with IIMB and McGill, and those are top schools. It's smaller than Warwick and perhaps not as well known but it is much better for marketing. If you can get into the Lancaster programme then you already know most of what Warwick would teach.

[Edited by Duncan on Jun 02, 2021]

quote

mido

2 3

Posted Jul 20, 2012 12:48

Thanks for your answer Duncan, This is the information I was looking for.
Really appreciate that.

quote