Hi all,
I need help deciding between the Rotterdam School of Management MBA and Warwick Business School MBA. I'm looking for a one-year, full-time MBA that will have the best global reputation. These two programs seem similarly ranked in many areas. Are both considered to be at the same "world class" level? Is one notably better?
The outcomes in the rankings seem similar, but this is what I've observed:
WBS:
Pro- Rising in the FT/Economist rankings, good brand name, good value, good academic reputation, good job placement
Con- Lower international mobility, slightly lower salary outcomes than peers (110k), Brexit fears
RSM:
Pro - Better salary outcomes (120k), better 5 year salary gain according to Forbes, good international mobility, quality of life in NL
Con - More expensive, language barrier, perhaps not as big of a brand as Warwick outside mainland Europe
Thoughts?
I need help deciding between the Rotterdam School of Management MBA and Warwick Business School MBA. I'm looking for a one-year, full-time MBA that will have the best global reputation. These two programs seem similarly ranked in many areas. Are both considered to be at the same "world class" level? Is one notably better?
The outcomes in the rankings seem similar, but this is what I've observed:
WBS:
Pro- Rising in the FT/Economist rankings, good brand name, good value, good academic reputation, good job placement
Con- Lower international mobility, slightly lower salary outcomes than peers (110k), Brexit fears
RSM:
Pro - Better salary outcomes (120k), better 5 year salary gain according to Forbes, good international mobility, quality of life in NL
Con - More expensive, language barrier, perhaps not as big of a brand as Warwick outside mainland Europe
Thoughts?